artefact
inventory:
about
artefact t&t:
ATICOM
in Germany:
site
search:
further
links:

|
This
is a site of independent philosophical thinking, free from institutional
strictures.
It is also Heidegger
territory — but not Heidegger for the sake of Heidegger.
His thinking is
here the gateway to a critical engagement with the entire Western tradition
of thinking.
The focus is not
an exposition of Heidegger's own questioning deconstruction of metaphysics,
but the critical reassessment of that very deconstruction.
Not the quiet front
of the scholarly history of ideas, but the jagged, cutting, bleeding, leading
edge itself.
Does Heidegger's
"step back" to a thinking of Ereignis have to be complemented by a side-step?
Does Heidegger's
diagnosis of the times, that the consummation of Western metaphysics culminates
in a constellation of being he terms the Gestell, itself remain captive
to productionist metaphysics? |
Does
the essence of capitalism have to be rethought in a way different from
both Marx's
Kapital and Heidegger's thinking of the essence of technology
as Gestell?
Although Sein
und Zeit provides a place for Mitdasein, can it be said that Heidegger's
phenomenology genuinely includes a social ontology?
Above all, do we
have an adequate ontology of social and political power?
Do the questions
concerning the constitution of you-and-me, I-and-we, remain, to the present
day, inadequately grounded and unfolded in phenomenological thinking?
If metaphysics has
always been concerned with the question of What, hasn't the question of
our standing in selfhood as Who remained more or less dormant in philosophy
since Plato and Aristotle?
Doing phenomenology
means learning to see in an age in which we are struck by blindness. |